The content viewing experience remains consistent across endpoint types, and content sharing mechanisms are the same, regardless of endpoint type: Skype users share content just like they would in a meeting that had only Skype endpoints, while video conferencing users share content the same way they would if they were in a meeting that had only video conferencing units. For example, a Skype for Business user still sees the gallery view an H.264 video endpoint can still see Hollywood squares.

In a Pexip call, the user has a consistent experience regardless of which endpoint is used. Anyone can join using their endpoint of choice, and the connection information is provided.

When scheduling a Pexip call, an email invitation is automatically created that gives all of the different connection methods: SIP, Skype for Business, and WebRTC. Two things about Pexip’s solution particularly standout for me: To test the solution, I have setup conferences on Pexip using multiple endpoint types including Skype for Business, an executive video conferencing device (H.264-based), mobile video using the Pexip client on iOS, and a PC with WebRTC. I’ve personally used the product a number of times, and it has worked flawlessly for me each time.

Who owns skype 2017